Skip to content

Follow your curiosity.

Try “brain”, “genomics”, or another subject you follow.

Neurotech · The big question

Mimicking evolution helps artificial intelligence learn much faster

Evolution imposes an inductive bias that alters and accelerates learning dynamics

Editorial illustration for Evolution imposes an inductive bias that alters and accelerates learning dynamics
Editorial illustration

Summary

When humans or animals learn a new skill, they do not start from a blank slate. Biological brains come equipped with built-in structures shaped by millions of years of evolution. This innate wiring allows nature to perform "few-shot learning", meaning organisms can pick up new tasks after just a few attempts. In contrast, standard artificial neural networks (computer systems designed to process information like a brain) usually start completely random and blank. Because they lack this evolutionary head start, these artificial networks require massive amounts of training data to learn comparable skills.

To see if computers could benefit from nature's approach, researchers developed a novel algorithm that combines the rules of natural selection with standard machine learning techniques. By simulating evolutionary conditioning, they hoped to build artificial networks that learn more like living brains. Interestingly, the researchers found that this evolutionary simulation by itself did not instantly create a highly capable system. On its own, the conditionally evolved network performed about the same as a basic, untrained computer model.

However, a major difference emerged once the researchers actually started teaching the networks. The artificial models shaped by simulated evolution showed unique, hidden learning dynamics that allowed them to rapidly fine-tune their skills. Instead of blindly guessing through trial and error, the artificially evolved networks used their built-in foundational traits to accelerate the learning process and quickly reach optimal performance.

Why it matters.

This research provides a promising blueprint for creating more efficient artificial intelligence. Currently, training advanced computer models requires enormous amounts of time, electricity, and data. If developers can successfully pre-condition artificial brains using simulated evolution, they could build systems that adapt and learn with a fraction of the traditional data requirements, potentially transforming how quickly new software and technological tools can be deployed.

Readers should keep in mind that this is early-stage, purely theoretical research. The current study is entirely computational, meaning the findings have not been validated in actual biological organisms or applied to real-world clinical or commercial settings. Nonetheless, understanding how nature accelerates learning could eventually help us build smarter, more nimble machines.

From the source

The story in numbers.

Machine learning contexts evaluated (reinforcement and supervised)
2
In vivo biological experiments (purely computational study)
0
Keep the context

Follow the evidence.

This source is a preprint and has not completed peer review. Its findings are provisional.

Your next discovery.

Keep exploring ↗
Neurotech

Scientists Map Fetal Brain Connections in Largest Study to Date

Before a baby is even born, their brain is busy wiring itself for the outside world. To understand exactly how this happens, researchers have conducted the largest study to date mapping the structural connections of the fetal brain. Using high-quality diffusion MRI, a specialized scanning technique that safely maps nerve pathways, scientists analyzed 198 fetuses between 22 and 37 weeks of gestation. By tracing these pathways, the team constructed individual "connectomes", or comprehensive maps of the brain's internal wiring. As they tracked these developmental trajectories over time, the researchers noticed distinct patterns. The brain networks showed consistent increases in both integration and segregation as the pregnancy progressed. In simple terms, integration means different regions of the brain become better at communicating with one another, while segregation means specific areas develop their own specialized local networks. To make sense of all this data, the research team created a novel mathematical method to build age-specific templates of the growing brain. This new approach proved far superior to older methods of simply averaging images together. In fact, these custom templates are so accurate that scientists can use them to successfully predict the exact gestational age of an individual fetus, with an average margin of error of less than a single week.

bioRxiv2 min read
Neurotech

Charting Male and Female Brain Differences From Womb to Old Age

Scientists have long debated how male and female brains differ. Now, researchers have built the largest roadmap of the human brain to date to find out. By analyzing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, which use strong magnets to take detailed pictures of internal body structures, the team examined over 100,000 individuals. This massive dataset includes people from before birth all the way up to 99 years old, with females making up just over half of the group. The researchers tracked 241 different brain structures and found significant sex differences in nearly all of them. Crucially, they proved these differences are not simply because men tend to have larger heads overall. Even after mathematically correcting for total brain volume, the structural differences remained. The study also revealed that male brains show more variation from person to person compared to female brains. Furthermore, as people grow older, the developmental paths of male and female brains actually drift further apart.

bioRxiv1 min read
Neurotech

Brain scans reveal two distinct connectivity patterns in autism

Autism is known for being incredibly diverse. Because the condition looks so different from person to person, scientists have long struggled to connect specific genetic risks to how the brain actually functions. To solve this puzzle, researchers recently designed a cross-species study to hunt for hidden biological similarities between mice and humans. The research team used functional magnetic resonance imaging, commonly known as fMRI, which is a type of scan that maps brain activity by tracking blood flow. They looked at 20 different mouse models carrying genetic risks for autism. By mapping these brain networks, the scientists discovered two primary patterns of atypical communication between brain regions. Crucially, each of these two brain wiring signatures was tied to a different underlying molecular process. After finding these signatures in mice, the researchers looked for them in autistic humans and successfully identified the same biological patterns. This establishes a foundational method to categorize autism based on real, measurable biology rather than just outward behavior. However, it is important to note that this is early-stage translational research. The initial findings do not disclose the sample size, demographics, or statistical strength of the human group used to validate the results, meaning more extensive testing will be required before this reaches clinics.

Nature Neuroscience2 min read

A little science goes a long way.

Clear, thoughtful biotech briefings. In your inbox three times a week.

Stay curious. Subscribe free ↗