Skip to content

Follow your curiosity.

Try “brain”, “genomics”, or another subject you follow.

Neurotech · The big question

How the brain uses two dopamine systems to balance risk and reward

Dopamine in the ventral and tail of striatum supports global and local evaluation in reward-threat conflict

Editorial illustration for Dopamine in the ventral and tail of striatum supports global and local evaluation in reward-threat conflict
Editorial illustration

Summary

Every day, animals must figure out how to get what they need to survive while avoiding danger. To understand how the brain handles this balancing act, researchers studied mice trying to fetch water while facing a threatening object. They focused on dopamine, a famous brain chemical often linked to pleasure that also plays a critical role in movement and learning. Specifically, they looked at dopamine sent to two different parts of a deep brain region called the striatum.

The team found that these two brain areas handle completely different types of information. One area, called the ventral striatum, acts like a built-in GPS system. When researchers disabled the dopamine cells connected to this area, the mice struggled to chase down rewards and avoid threats. Brain recordings showed that dopamine here tracks how fast the animal is moving toward its current goal. It helps the mouse navigate the big picture of its environment, a process scientists call goal-directed navigation.

Meanwhile, the second area, known as the tail of the striatum, works more like a proximity alarm. Dopamine in this region responds immediately to what the mouse is sensing right in front of it. It calculates exactly how close the scary object is and which direction the mouse is facing. Together, these two dopamine systems allow the animal to map out its goals while staying alert to immediate dangers nearby.

Why it matters.

Understanding exactly how dopamine helps mammals juggle risks and rewards is crucial for figuring out how the brain makes complex survival decisions. While we are still far from clinical applications, mapping these distinct dopamine pathways could eventually shed light on human psychiatric conditions where risk assessment and reward-seeking are altered, such as anxiety disorders or addiction. However, it is important to note that this is early-stage research. Because these findings are based entirely on a preclinical mouse model, scientists still need to establish whether human dopamine systems divide up the work of threat and goal tracking in the exact same way.

From the source

The story in numbers.

Distinct striatal regions analyzed (VS and TS)
2
Preclinical animal model species (Mice)
1
Keep the context

Follow the evidence.

This source is a preprint and has not completed peer review. Its findings are provisional.

Your next discovery.

Keep exploring ↗
Neurotech

Scientists Map Fetal Brain Connections in Largest Study to Date

Before a baby is even born, their brain is busy wiring itself for the outside world. To understand exactly how this happens, researchers have conducted the largest study to date mapping the structural connections of the fetal brain. Using high-quality diffusion MRI, a specialized scanning technique that safely maps nerve pathways, scientists analyzed 198 fetuses between 22 and 37 weeks of gestation. By tracing these pathways, the team constructed individual "connectomes", or comprehensive maps of the brain's internal wiring. As they tracked these developmental trajectories over time, the researchers noticed distinct patterns. The brain networks showed consistent increases in both integration and segregation as the pregnancy progressed. In simple terms, integration means different regions of the brain become better at communicating with one another, while segregation means specific areas develop their own specialized local networks. To make sense of all this data, the research team created a novel mathematical method to build age-specific templates of the growing brain. This new approach proved far superior to older methods of simply averaging images together. In fact, these custom templates are so accurate that scientists can use them to successfully predict the exact gestational age of an individual fetus, with an average margin of error of less than a single week.

bioRxiv2 min read
Neurotech

Charting Male and Female Brain Differences From Womb to Old Age

Scientists have long debated how male and female brains differ. Now, researchers have built the largest roadmap of the human brain to date to find out. By analyzing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, which use strong magnets to take detailed pictures of internal body structures, the team examined over 100,000 individuals. This massive dataset includes people from before birth all the way up to 99 years old, with females making up just over half of the group. The researchers tracked 241 different brain structures and found significant sex differences in nearly all of them. Crucially, they proved these differences are not simply because men tend to have larger heads overall. Even after mathematically correcting for total brain volume, the structural differences remained. The study also revealed that male brains show more variation from person to person compared to female brains. Furthermore, as people grow older, the developmental paths of male and female brains actually drift further apart.

bioRxiv1 min read
Neurotech

Brain scans reveal two distinct connectivity patterns in autism

Autism is known for being incredibly diverse. Because the condition looks so different from person to person, scientists have long struggled to connect specific genetic risks to how the brain actually functions. To solve this puzzle, researchers recently designed a cross-species study to hunt for hidden biological similarities between mice and humans. The research team used functional magnetic resonance imaging, commonly known as fMRI, which is a type of scan that maps brain activity by tracking blood flow. They looked at 20 different mouse models carrying genetic risks for autism. By mapping these brain networks, the scientists discovered two primary patterns of atypical communication between brain regions. Crucially, each of these two brain wiring signatures was tied to a different underlying molecular process. After finding these signatures in mice, the researchers looked for them in autistic humans and successfully identified the same biological patterns. This establishes a foundational method to categorize autism based on real, measurable biology rather than just outward behavior. However, it is important to note that this is early-stage translational research. The initial findings do not disclose the sample size, demographics, or statistical strength of the human group used to validate the results, meaning more extensive testing will be required before this reaches clinics.

Nature Neuroscience2 min read

A little science goes a long way.

Clear, thoughtful biotech briefings. In your inbox three times a week.

Stay curious. Subscribe free ↗
How the brain uses two dopamine systems to balance risk and reward — Daily Strand