Back to Home
Daily Strand / Oncology
Oncology

Combined elevation of pre-treatment γ-glutamyltransferase and lactate dehydrogenase as independent prognosticator for metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing immune-based therapy.

Two Common Blood Tests Predict Advanced Kidney Cancer Survival

April 19, 2026/2 read/PubMed

Summarized by Daily Strand AI from peer-reviewed source

Summary

When patients are diagnosed with advanced kidney cancer, formally known as metastatic renal cell carcinoma, doctors often turn to treatments that harness the immune system to fight the disease. A major challenge in this process is predicting how individual patients will fare over time. Now, researchers have found that looking at two routine blood markers before treatment begins can help forecast patient survival.

The researchers focused on two specific enzymes commonly measured in standard blood panels: lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT). By looking at the records of 240 patients treated in real-world clinic settings, the team discovered a strong pattern. Patients with low baseline levels of LDH went significantly longer before their cancer progressed. Even better, patients who had low levels of both LDH and GGT lived longer overall. Conversely, when both of these enzymes were elevated at the same time, patients faced a higher risk of their disease worsening and a higher overall mortality rate.

Interestingly, the researchers noted that these enzymes could not predict whether the tumors would initially shrink in response to the therapy. Instead, combining the results of these two tests gave doctors a much sharper lens for viewing long-term survival trends, proving more powerful than looking at either marker alone.

Why It Matters

For patients facing advanced kidney cancer, uncertainty is a heavy burden. If oncologists can use simple, inexpensive blood tests to accurately gauge a patient's risk level before starting immune-based therapy, they can provide more personalized care. Knowing a patient falls into a higher risk category could prompt doctors to monitor them more closely or consider enrolling them in clinical trials for novel treatments.

While these results are highly encouraging, the researchers point out an important caveat. The study was retrospective, meaning it looked backward at the medical records of a 240-patient cohort. Before these blood markers can be officially used to guide clinical decisions, scientists will need to conduct prospective studies, which involve tracking new patients moving forward in time, to fully confirm these predictive models.

Key Figures
240
mRCC patients in the multicentric cohort
4
Serum parameters evaluated (ALAT, ASAT, GGT, LDH)
Original Source
PubMed — View original paper

DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01295-0

Interested in Oncology?

Newsletter

Never miss a breakthrough.

Join 10,000+ curious minds getting biotech stories distilled into plain language. Free, three times a week.